Table of Contents

• PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION 1790.
• INTRODUCTION.
  • I. Division of Philosophy.
  • II. The Realm of Philosophy in General.
  • III. The Critique of Judgement as a means of connecting the two Parts of Philosophy in a whole.
  • IV. Judgement as a Faculty by which Laws are prescribed a priori.
  • V. The Principle of the formal finality of Nature is a transcendental Principle of Judgement.
  • VI. The Association of the Feeling of Pleasure with the Concept of the Finality of Nature.
  • VII. The Aesthetic Representation of the Finality of Nature.
  • VIII. The Logical Representation of the Finality of Nature.
  • IX. Joinder of the Legislations of Understanding and Reason by means of Judgement.
• FIRST PART. CRITIQUE OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT
• SECTION I. ANALYTIC OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT.
  • BOOK I. Analytic of the Beautiful.
    • FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgement of Taste: Moment of Quality.
      • SS 1. The judgement of taste is aesthetic.
      • SS 2. The delight which determines the judgement of taste is independent of all interest.
      • SS 3. Delight in the agreeable is coupled with interest.
      • SS 4. Delight in the good is coupled with interest.
      • SS 5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of delight.
      • Definition of the Beautiful derived from the First Moment.
    • SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgement of Taste: Moment of Quantity.
      • SS 6. The beautiful is that which, apart from concepts, is represented as the Object of a universal delight.
      • SS 7. Comparison of the beautiful with the agreeable and the good by means of the above characteristic.
      • SS 8. In a judgement of taste the universality of delight is only represented as subjective.
      • SS 9. Investigation of the question of the relative priority in a judgement of taste of the feeling of pleasure and the estimating of the object.
      • Definition of the Beautiful drawn from the Second Moment.
    • THIRD MOMENT. Of Judgements of Taste: Moment of the relation of the Ends brought under Review in such Judgements.
      • SS 10. Finality in general.
      • SS 11. The sole foundation of the judgement of taste is the form of finality of an object (or mode of representing it).
      • SS 12. The judgement of taste rests upon a priori grounds.
      • SS 13. The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion.
      • SS 14. Exemplification.
      • SS 15. The judgement of taste is entirely independent of the concept of perfection.
      • SS 16. A judgement of taste by which an object is described as beautiful, under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure.
      • SS 17. Ideal of beauty.
      • Definition of the Beautiful Derived from this Third Moment.
    • FOURTH MOMENT. Of the Judgement of Taste: Moment of the Modality of the Delight in the Object.
      • SS 18. Nature of the modality in a judgement of taste.
      • SS 19. The subjective necessity attributed to a judgement of taste is conditioned.
      • SS 20. The condition of the necessity advanced by a judgement of taste is the idea of a common sense.
      • SS 21. Have we reason for presupposing a common sense?
      • SS 22. The necessity of the universal assent that is thought in a judgement of taste, is a subjective necessity which, under the presupposition of a common sense, is represented as objective.
      • Definition of the Beautiful drawn from the Fourth Moment.
      • General Remark on the First Section of the Analytic.
  • BOOK II. Analytic of the Sublime.
    • SS 23. Transition from the faculty of estimating the beautiful to that of estimating the sublime.
    • SS 24. Subdivision of an investigation of the feeling of the sublime.
    • A. THE MATHEMATICALLY SUBLIME.
    • SS 25. Definition of the term “sublime”.
    • SS 26. The estimation of the magnitude of natural things requisite for the idea of the sublime.
    • SS 27. Quality of the delight in our estimate of the sublime.
    • B. THE DYNAMICALLY SUBLIME IN NATURE.
    • SS 28. Nature as Might.
    • SS 29. Modality of the judgement on the sublime in nature.
    • General Remark upon the Exposition of Aesthetic Reflective Judgements.
    • Deduction of Pure Aesthetic Judgements.
    • SS 30. The deduction of aesthetic judgements upon objects of nature must not be directed to what we call sublime in nature, but only to the beautiful.
    • SS 31. Of the method of the deduction of judgements of taste.
    • SS 32. First peculiarity of the judgement of taste.
    • SS 33. Second peculiarity of the judgement of taste.
    • SS 34. An objective principle of taste is not possible.
    • SS 35. The principle of taste is the subjective principle of the general power of judgement.
    • SS 36. The problem of a deduction of judgements of taste.
    • SS 37. What exactly it is that is asserted a priori of an object in a judgement of taste.
    • SS 38. Deduction of judgements of taste.
    • Remark.
    • SS 39. The communicability of a sensation.
    • SS 40. Taste as a kind of sensus communis.
    • SS 41. The empirical interest in the beautiful.
    • SS 42. The intellectual interest in the beautiful.
    • SS 43. Art in general.
    • SS 44. Fine art
    • SS 45. Fine art is an art, so far as it has at the same time the appearance of being nature.
    • SS 46. Fine art is the art of genius.
    • SS 47. Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of genius.
    • SS 48. The relation of genius to taste.
    • SS 49. The faculties of the mind which constitute genius.
    • SS 50. The combination of taste and genius in products of fine art.
    • SS 51. The division of the fine arts.
    • SS 52. The combination of the fine arts in one and the same product.
    • SS 53. Comparative estimate of the aesthetic worth of the fine arts.
    • SS 54. Remark.
• SECTION II. DIALECTIC OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT.
  • SS 55.
  • SS 56. Representation of the antinomy of taste.
  • SS 57. Solution of the antinomy of taste.
  • SS 58. The idealism of the finality alike of nature and of art, as the unique principle of the aesthetic judgement.
  • SS 59. Beauty as the symbol of morality.
  • SS 60. APPENDIX. The methodology of taste.